Compensation Philosophy Paper 

Evaluate the current compensation philosophy for your organization or an organization of your choosing (from a third-person perspective). Write a three-to-five page paper (not including the title and reference pages). Your paper should be written in a scholarly third-person tone; it should be in APA format. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, your paper should address the following:

1. Evaluate the organization’s current compensation philosophy and propose ways to enhance or revamp the current compensation philosophy to meet the changing needs of the organization and its employees.
2. Examine key factors within the internal and external environment including the mission and strategic focus of the organization, as well as the financial and cultural aspects of your organization (i.e., they cannot have a compensation philosophy where they “lead” the market if the organization does not have the financial resources) that should influence this philosophy. The proposed philosophy itself should be no more than a short paragraph.
3. Identify the key factors that should contribute to the organization’s development based on your proposed organizational philosophy.

Remember to write from a third-person perspective. Do not include wording like “my company’s philosophy is …” Instead include wording like “XYZ Company Name’s philosophy is …” Remember to write about the company and the company’s philosophy; do not refer to you or your connection to the company.

In addition to the text, cite at least two scholarly references to support your discussion.

Recommended Readings

1. Read the following journal articles for further insight into this week’s topics:
   • Gordon, J.N. (2005). Executive compensation: If there’s a problem, what’s the remedy? The case for “compensation discussion and analysis”. Journal of Corporation Law, 30(4), 675-702. Retrieved from the Proquest database.
   • Harris, J. (2009). What’s wrong with executive compensation? Journal of Business Ethics: Supplement, 85, 147-156. (Document ID: 1655246711). Retrieved from the Proquest database.
   • Henderson, M.T., & Spindler, J.C. (2005). Corporate heroin: A defense of perks, executive loans, and conspicuous consumption. Georgetown Law Journal, 93(6), 1835-1883. Retrieved from the Proquest database.

ScholarMatic: Explanation & Answer

Your ready answer from a verified tutor is just a click away for as little as $14.99

---

  

Click Order Now to get 100% Original Answer Customized to your instructions!