write a brief meta-analysis paper comparing and contrasting two different points of view of a theory Using at least four different research articles, write a paper that explains the theory and then reports the different views taken by researchers. Use the PsychARTICLES engine to find your articles.
The subject is Medical marijuana for epilepsy…
Report how a professional in this field uses research to guide practice. Explain how a professional uses an unbiased approach to evaluate the research to best use it.
In this Assignment, be sure to include the following:
An explanation of the controversial topic chosen for the paper. (Is medical marijuana the best option for epilepsy treatment?) A brief description of each of the research models used in the four studies selected for the paper. Include why the researcher selected that model for the study. Explanation of how the researchers used the scientific method to guide their studies. Clear comparison and contrast of the two sides of the controversy using the four studies (e.g., two studies that support one side of the controversy(for medical marijuana use for epilepsy) and two studies that support the opposite perspective(against use of medical marijuana for epilepsy)) Provide a conclusion as to which side seems more plausible and justify your response (e.g., “while some experts believe that children who attend child care for more than two years do not show greater social skills, the studies used in this paper provide strong evidence that there is a benefit”). Propose how a professional would use the results of your paper to guide his or her practice with clients.
Requirements for each paper: Be sure to use specific information from the text to support your answers. (When referencing the text, APA formatting must be used.)





