Public International Law
Assessment task
In a discussion of the decision of the International Court of Justice in Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 (The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia v. Greece) (I.C.J. Reports 2011, p.644) Francesco Messineo states that: despite the formal separation between the name dispute and the object of the legal dispute before the ICJ, the Court?s judgment can in fact be construed as an intervention in the name dispute.
In a discussion of the decision of the International Court of Justice in Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 (The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia v. Greece) (I.C.J. Reports 2011, p.644) Francesco Messineo states that: despite the formal separation between the name dispute and the object of the legal dispute before the ICJ, the Court?s judgment can in fact be construed as an intervention in the name dispute.
Francesco Messineo, ?Maps of Ephemeral Empires: The ICJ and the Macedonian Name Dispute? (2012) 1 Cambridge J. Int?l & Comp. L. 169-190, at 170-171
Indicate whether you agree or disagree with Francesco Messineo.
Indicate whether you agree or disagree with Francesco Messineo.
This assessment task requires you to provide an appraisal of the above statement by Francesco Messineo. In doing so you are required to both analyse and critically evaluate the statement. This means you will need to research the case and retrieve legal journal articles utilising the Library?s Databases.
ScholarMatic: Explanation & Answer
Your ready answer from a verified tutor is just a click away for as little as $14.99
Click Order Now to get 100% Original Answer Customized to your instructions!
