Explain the two criticisms of Bayesianism that Chalmers is
referring to with these two comments. “It follows that any
disagreements in science, between proponents of rival research
programs, paradigms or whatever, reflected in the posterior beliefs
of scientists must have ther source in the prior probabilities held
by the scientists. “A little later, he says, an extreme, and
telling example is provided by peter gallison’s account of the
nature of the work in current fundamental particle physics”. Why do
these criticisms of prior probabilities make the Bayesian
enterprise very troublesome?