You are asked by a local, progressive newspaper to write an
Op-Ed piece explaining why President Trump’s proposed cuts to the
US EPA budget, including cuts to the Endocrine Disruption program
is a bad idea, especially from a human health perspective. Which of
the following environmental health themes might you reasonably
include to support your position.

A. Uncertainly about the type and range of adverse health
effects caused by endocrine disruptors.

B. Uncertainty about endocrine disruptor dose-response
relationships and possibility of non-threshold effects.

C. Ubiquitous and pervasive environmental presence of chemicals
with endocrine disruption potential, particularly within common
consumer and household products.

D. Population-based biomonitoring studies, such as conducted by
the CDC, which demonstrate the presence of endocrine disruptive
chemicals in human tissues.

E. All the above