Research Proposal

1. Write the title of the research

2. Write a brief discussion of the background to the research

3. Describe the problem situation that you want to investigate

4. Write three research questions that you want to find answers to.

5. Write the objectives of the study

6. Why do you think this study is important?

7. Discuss the theoretical framework (hypotheses/proposition) that you will use to
guide the study? Provide reasons why you want to use this framework.
(400 words)

8. Write a brief outline of the research methods that you hope to use to help you
conduct the study; Give your reasons why you want to use these methods

9. Briefly explain the data collection techniques you want to use; give your reasons
for choosing these techniques.

10. How do you hope to address ethical issues?

11. Briefly explain the data analysis techniques you want to use; give your reasons.

12. Briefly comment on the contributions this study hopes to make.

13. Draw a high level plan that shows resources, timescales, tasks to be carried out
to complete the study. [Hint: You may use MS Excel or MS Project].

References:
Critiquing An Academic Research Paper – A Guide

1. Does the abstract adequately summarise the article?
2. Does the introduction fully set the context for the research?
3. Is there an adequate overview of relevant literature in the area?
4. Are the terms adequately defined?
5. Are the limitations and or strengths of existing studies discussed?
6. Is a critical or descriptive perspective adopted?
7. Are there any gaps or oversights?
8. Is the sample size large enough for any conclusions to be valid?
9. Are the research methods clearly described?
10. Are data gathering and analysis techniques and tools transparent and visible?
11. Is it clear what data sets are being used?
12. Do we learn a sufficient amount about the context in which the research was
conducted?
13. Is the writing style clear or is there evidence of vagueness and or repetition?

14. How successful is the paper in demonstrating an ability to move beyond
description and critically analyse data?
15. How easy is it to follow the thread of the argument? Is it coherent, well structured
or muddled?
16. Are there any unsupported statements/assertions?
17. Is the data related back to existing research in the area?
18. Are any quotations included supported by sufficient commentary?
19. Is a reflexive approach to both methods and data adopted?
20. Are other possible interpretations recognised?
21. Does the paper develop new theoretical insights or add constructively to existing
theory?
22. How well does the paper look at interactions?
23. Is use made of tests of statistical significance?
24. Are the statistics mainly descriptive rather than confirmatory?
25. Are there any exaggerated claims?
26. What do you like about the paper? Why?
27. What do you dislike about the paper? Why?
28. Are the interpretations consistent with the result?
29. How well is the interpretation of the results linked to the theoretical background?
30. How strong is the conclusion?
31. Does the study show anything new, innovative or or particular interest?
32. If a theoretical or a philosophical perspective is employed, what is this
perspective?
33. Is this consistent with the problem, methodology, data collection and the
analytical techniques?

ScholarMatic: Explanation & Answer

Your ready answer from a verified tutor is just a click away for as little as $14.99

---

  

Click Order Now to get 100% Original Answer Customized to your instructions!